Google
Edit File: 1775082668.M644089P2397775.server-619288.prediksijaya.com,S=4576,W=4666
Return-Path: <hernardo@meta.ua> Delivered-To: angker+spam@server-619288.prediksijaya.com Received: from server-619288.prediksijaya.com by server-619288.prediksijaya.com with LMTP id fyk7JqyczWlPliQAf7/9AQ (envelope-from <hernardo@meta.ua>) for <angker+spam@server-619288.prediksijaya.com>; Thu, 02 Apr 2026 05:31:08 +0700 Return-path: <hernardo@meta.ua> Envelope-to: vetyl@ponjosonek.com Delivery-date: Thu, 02 Apr 2026 05:31:08 +0700 Received: from [103.154.76.52] (port=41429 helo=ponjosonek.com) by server-619288.prediksijaya.com with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1) (envelope-from <hernardo@meta.ua>) id 1w845Y-0000000A3iy-06PI for vetyl@ponjosonek.com; Thu, 02 Apr 2026 05:31:08 +0700 Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2026 01:30:20 +0300 To: vetyl@ponjosonek.com From: =?utf-8?B?0JjQstCw0L0=?= <hernardo@meta.ua> Message-ID: <1775082620.29c2de6a4ce19962b0dfe0effac57620@mailsys> MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-to: =?utf-8?B?0JjQstCw0L0=?= <tenueteese@list.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=14.7 X-Spam-Score: 147 X-Spam-Bar: ++++++++++++++ X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "server-619288.prediksijaya.com", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see root\@localhost for details. Content preview: ____________! __ __________ _____________ ______________ _ __________________. - ________ _____ - _____ - ______ - _____________ ______ - ________ - _________ - __________ _______ Content analysis details: (14.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.5 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. [103.154.76.52 listed in sa-trusted.bondedsender.org] 0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. [103.154.76.52 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com] 0.0 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. [103.154.76.52 listed in sa-accredit.habeas.com] 1.5 RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_BL RBL: Sender listed in HOSTKARMA-BLACK [103.154.76.52 listed in hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com] 6.2 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L5 RBL: Very bad reputation (-5) [103.154.76.52 listed in bl.mailspike.net] 1.5 SPF_HELO_SOFTFAIL SPF: HELO does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.0 KAM_DMARC_STATUS Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_BL Mailspike blocklisted 0.2 KAM_DMARC_NONE DKIM has Failed or SPF has failed on the message and the domain has no DMARC policy 2.0 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS 1.8 FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO Freemail in Reply-To, but not From X-Spam-Flag: YES Subject: =?utf-8?B?0J/QviDQv9C+0LLQvtC00YMg0LjQt9C00LXQu9C40Lkg0LjQtyDQvNC10YLQsNC70LvQsA==?= 0JfQtNGA0LDQstGB0YLQstGD0LnRgtC1IQoK0JzRiyDQt9Cw0L3QuNC80LDQtdC80YHRjyDQuNC3 0LPQvtGC0L7QstC70LXQvdC40LXQvCDQvNC10YLQsNC70LvQvtC40LfQtNC10LvQuNC5INC4INC8 0LXRgtCw0LvQu9C+0LrQvtC90YHRgtGA0YPQutGG0LjQuS4KCi0g0JvQsNC30LXRgNC90LDRjyDR gNC10LfQutCwCi0g0JPQuNCx0LrQsAotINCh0LLQsNGA0LrQsAotINCc0LXRhdCw0L3QvtGB0LHQ vtGA0L3Ri9C1INGA0LDQsdC+0YLRiwotINCf0L7QutGA0LDRgdC60LAKLSDQntGG0LjQvdC60L7Q stC60LAKLSDQoNCw0LfRgNCw0LHQvtGC0LrQsCDQuNC30LTQtdC70LjQuQoK0J/QuNGI0YMg0YfR gtC+0LHRiyDQv9GA0LXQtNC70L7QttC40YLRjCDQuNC30LPQvtGC0L7QstC40YLRjCDQu9GO0LHR i9C1INC40LfQtNC10LvQuNGPINC00LvRjyDQktCw0YjQtdC5INC00LXRj9GC0LXQu9GM0L3QvtGB 0YLQuC4KCtChINGD0LLQsNC20LXQvdC40LXQvCwg0JjQstCw0L0uCtCzLiDQnNC+0YHQutCy0LA=